POSTING GUIDELINES
This forum is intended to provide an atmosphere of open communication, where each member can share his or her own insights and opinions. To help achieve this goal, we ask that you:
Do not post libelous or illegal material.
Do not post harassing or discriminatory comments based on race, ethnic origin, gender, or sexual orientation.
Do not solicit or advertise.
If you have questions or comments about this forum (such as technical difficulties or performance issues), please contact your forum administrator for the appropriate channel for your inquiry.
Moderation
Any post that violates the above conditions, or departs from the intended purpose of this forum may be removed without notice by the administration.
We reserve the right to edit any post for reasons including, but not limited to: language, length, or content not appropriate to the topic of this forum.
Older threads or messages may be removed from time to time, to main to maintain categories or threads of manageable length.
Any member who breaches these Guidelines through hostile, abusive or other inappropriate behavior may find their account privileges revoked.
Privacy
Remember that this is a public forum, and you have no guarantee or expectation of privacy. Your post could be read by anyone.
Posts can be traced. We record information about every user of this forum, and will honor any court orders or requests by recognized law authorities for information about individuals posting libelous material.
All communications on this board are deemed to by public and not private communications. We reserve the right to remove without notice any message posted for any reason, but we have no obligation to remove content you find objectionable.
Regarding your email address and other personal information
Although we require your email address for verification purposes, we recommend that you do not post it or any other personal information such, as phone numbers or your home address. Your posts can be searched by bots or third parties that have no affiliation with the administrator of this forum.
Disclaimer
The views expressed by members of this forum are their own and do not reflect the position of the administrator or other members. Each member is responsible for the content of his/her own posts.
Please report any activity that you notice which is libelous, inflammatory, or in violation of common decency to the management immediately.
This mornings Nicky Campbell Phone In was one hour dedicated to asking if the new Band Aid single is good for Africa and the ebola crisis, or is it just western pop stars interfering and trying to claim credit and attention for themselves?
Lots of good calls, both pro and anti. Geldof comes in for some stick,and also some praise, so fairly balanced, but an interesting snapshot of peoples views nonetheless.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0070htg
-- Edited by noelindublin on Monday 24th of November 2014 04:03:14 PM
The increased criticism over '84 shows what sort of a complaint-centric country we have become. Whether it's the Jubilee, the Olympics, Band Aid, the Government, transport, weather - you name it, out come the armchair critics, foaming at the mouth, fulminating about motive, cost, presentation etc but wholly devoid in most cases of a solution of their own.
Where they think they have a (generally poorly thought through, impractical) solution, they are astonished nobody has tried to implement it and often disappear down the route of paranoia and secret gangs at work (see virtually any post on David Icke's forum).
Make up your own mind and be happy with it. Just because someone puts forward a view, doesn't mean they genuinely hold it, either. I'd say a lot of it is attention seeking nonsense.
I've listened to the arguments on this one and know what my settled position is. You can probably guess it. I shan't post again in this topic.
The increased criticism over '84 shows what sort of a complaint-centric country we have become. Whether it's the Jubilee, the Olympics, Band Aid, the Government, transport, weather - you name it, out come the armchair critics, foaming at the mouth, fulminating about motive, cost, presentation etc but wholly devoid in most cases of a solution of their own.
Where they think they have a (generally poorly thought through, impractical) solution, they are astonished nobody has tried to implement it and often disappear down the route of paranoia and secret gangs at work (see virtually any post on David Icke's forum).
Make up your own mind and be happy with it. Just because someone puts forward a view, doesn't mean they genuinely hold it, either. I'd say a lot of it is attention seeking nonsense.
I've listened to the arguments on this one and know what my settled position is. You can probably guess it. I shan't post again in this topic.
A few of the callers were asking why all the rich pop stars can't just give their money directly, rather than asking the public to contribute,and then 'basking' in the reflected glory of their goodwill. Maybe that's a fair point? It's the 'ego feed' for the pop stars they tend to dislike, more than the cause itself.
Reminds me of being in Boots in London and being asked would I like to donate to Children In Need? Why don't Boots just give some of their vast profits directly, rather then asking their customers, and then getting the 'glory' for having contributed? I resent being asked for money almost everywhere I go. You can't walk anywhere in Dublin without some chugger rattling a tin can at you.
-- Edited by noelindublin on Tuesday 25th of November 2014 02:08:39 PM